On Sep 11, 2008, at 3:29 AM, Michael C. Harris wrote:
>
> On Wed, Sep 10, 2008 at 05:50:14AM -0700, drzax wrote:
>>
>> On Sep 10, 11:57 am, "Chris Meller" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> On Wed, Sep 10, 2008 at 5:00 AM, drzax <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Good idea, but how do you capture the data? Is it simply anyone
>>>> who's
>>>> ever edited the post becomes an author? I suspect that wouldn't be
>>>> suitable. If I was editor of a multi-author blog, chances are I'd
>>>> be
>>>> making edits to submitted articles, but I wouldn't want to be
>>>> counted
>>>> as an author.
>>>
>>> Maybe something like Wikimedia's 'this is a minor edit'? 'Add me
>>> as an
>>> author'? *shrug*
>>
>> Aren't we already getting one of those check boxes for the Atom
>> updates? Unfortunately I don't think one setting can serve both those
>> purposes.
>
> Yes, there will be. We'd need two checkboxes that would show up under
> these circumstances:
>
> // Ignore arguments about exact UI for now
> if ( post is published )
> add_check('minor edit', checked = true)
> if ( author != user )
> add_check('add author', checked = false)
>
> Is there a reason multi-author should be core rather than a plugin ?
I'm perfectly fine with making the interface to do so be in a plugin.
But the data structure still needs to be core, otherwise we run into
the issues again.
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/habari-dev
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
