I was going to suggest not touching the user/ ... but then devs might get confused?
On Sep 29, 9:36 pm, Arthus Erea <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I don't like the idea of reducing unnecessary complication, especially > when it comes to the user themes directory. > > I don't know about you, but the URL 'user/themes/user/foo' seems ripe > for confusion... > > My question is: why? What practical aim does this serve to users to > justify this added confusion? > > What would be the problem with simply putting the admin and installer > themes in system/themes/admin – I think we can safely assume nobody is > going to name a theme "admin" – and if they do we should probably > assume it is meant as a replacement for the admin interface. > > On Sep 29, 2008, at 9:25 PM, Andrew da Silva wrote: > > > > > > > Clutter in AdminHandler got me thinking... > > > Since admin and installer are themes, why are they still in > > independent folders? > > > Sure, admin and installer in system/themes could be troublesome, but > > would it? > > We control what goes in system/themes... no risk of overwriting. > > Only problem I can foresee is user/themes/admin and installer... > > > In the end, I think we should remove those two folders from system, it > > makes no sense anymore. > > > If installer is considered "administration" material, maybe we could > > create... > > > system/themes/admin/installer > > system/themes/admin/default > > system/themes/user/k2 > > system/themes/user/mzingi > > system/themes/user/charcoal > > > And replicate in the user folder.. > > > user/themes/admin/... > > user/themes/user/... > > > This way Habari would mainly be an API completely customizable from A > > to Z... --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/habari-dev -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
