I don't think this needs to be high priority, but it should be considered for eventual implementation.
On Sep 30, 2008, at 9:11 AM, Christian Mohn (h0bbel) wrote: > > Agreed. > > I don't really see why we should spend any time on this, at least > not now. > There are other more pressing issues that should be taken care of. > > Christian > -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] [mailto:habari- > [EMAIL PROTECTED] On > Behalf Of Owen Winkler > Sent: 30. september 2008 14:14 > To: [email protected] > Subject: [habari-dev] Re: Why are admin and installer still distinct > from > themes? > > > I think this discussion is inappropriate at this time. > > By allowing easy user-supplied admin themes we'd be encouraging a > situation where users could quite easily damage their overall > install in > many ways, including making their admin inaccessible or causing > discrete > components of the admin to fail. > > In addition, nearly the entire admin "theme" relies on specific > methods > with the adminhandler, the analog for the admin theme's theme.php. > Writing any supplemental admin theme would likely involve rewriting a > significant and impractical amount of the handler code. As I understand it, no you wouldn't. The same handler would be used for the new admin theme, it would simply use different presentation files. > > > There are so many other things to do right now to bring Habari into a > useful state with the admin that we have, I simply don't see any > compelling reason to make this change now, or even provide the > rudiments > for it. It certainly doesn't simplify any other task currently in > queue. Is there some latent user request for this? > > Owen > > > > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/habari-dev -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
