On Fri, Mar 27, 2009 at 4:27 AM, Michael Harris <[email protected]>wrote:
> > 2009/3/27 Randy Walker <[email protected]>: > > > > Taxonomy's not included in this list. Where should it go? And yes, 1.0 > > is just a well-tested 0.9. > > While I broadly support the outline, I don't think we should be too > rigid. If we manage to get taxonomy done and the autop fixed up and > some really good test coverage, for example, we should feel free to > release 0.7 without waiting for "theming refinements". If that means > we go to 0.10 and 0.11 before 1.0, that's fine. I agree. This shouldn't be considered anything more than a guideline... We're not committing to anything on the list in particular, it's more of a "wishlist". Release early, release often! --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/habari-dev -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
