As I said, I found IRC particularly useful when I first got started
with Habari and had the occasional technical question.

There are two reasons I am now a less frequent visitor

Firstly, I rarely have any technical Habari related issues to discuss
or, more specifically, have not got much to offer and contribute.

Secondly, some of the content and discussions is a little puerile for
my taste. Occasionally, I am genuinely shocked by the lack of respect,
intelligent adults show to each other.

I'm no prude but it's like coming into a pub where everyone knows each
other and has been drinking all day.

On Mar 31, 5:13 pm, Chris Meller <[email protected]> wrote:
> Branching off this conversation into its own thread so we don't clutter an
> unrelated issue.
>
> On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 9:33 AM, Owen Winkler <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > The IRC channel is of late typically not very respectful of visitors.
> > Mibbit has the ability to display some backlog, and there's no telling
> > what talk or links will appear in there even if people are civil when
> > obvious new Mibbit users show up.
>
> I think "not respectful" is perhaps not the best choice of words. The
> content may not be appropriate for all visitors, but it's not as if anyone
> has been rude to a visitor (at least not that I've seen, and I'm generally
> around a good part of the day).
>
> > <snip>
>
> > This brings up the tangential issue of IRC conduct lately.
>
> > I have absolutely no problem using the IRC channel as a social gathering
> > place, but regulars there need to keep in mind that users are told to
> > come to that channel for help.  I simply can't imagine the image that
> > we're portraying to church website builders, serious business people,
> > and parents of web-savvy children who come to IRC for help on our
> > recommendation to do so.  Some of the stuff going on there is outright
> > shameful.
>
> Particularly in the last couple of days we have had a rise in the number of
> links to pictures and similar content that I personally would not take an
> interest in or share, especially with strangers. Toning those down would be
> fine with me.
>
> On the other hand, I think it's important to recognize that obviously not
> everyone agrees with my definition of "appropriate" content (otherwise they
> wouldn't be sharing these links either), so we need to respect the opinions
> of others.
>
> > It's harrowing that people who supposedly have the authority to keep the
> > channel in check are often the ones responsible for the noise.
>
> Again, I think this comes down to the meritocracy concept and the idea that
> other people have differing views. Unless you're being verbally abusive or
> spamming, no one feels comfortable taking an authoritarian role and telling
> anyone something's unacceptable.
>
> Lately, the channel has become a festering link dump.  I'm personally
>
> > sick of seeing tons of unsolicited links to whatever latest found
> > YouTube video looks "cool".  At least one out of every three of the
> > recent round of "unexplained photos" links seemed inappropriate for the
> > channel.  While I admit to appreciating some of these links for their
> > simple humor, I don't believe that they're always appropriate for the
> > kind of environment that would encourage tentative users to return.
>
> Agreed. While I don't think we should expect the channel to be 100%
> business, I think we may have passed that fine line lately. Encouraging
> everyone to filter themselves ever so slightly more than they have been in
> the past week or two would probably be a good thing.
>
> > One might say that the links don't hurt anyone; that nobody complains.
> > I have been off IRC lately for the past couple of days, specifically
> > because the signal/noise ratio has dropped below my willingness to
> > filter it.  But more importantly, when I did return last night, I
> > received more than one complaint via private message about the
> > appropriateness of some of the content in the channel.
>
> No one has complained in the channel. I would encourage anyone who does have
> a problem to speak up rather than bottle it up or funnel it to you. Like I
> said, it's meritocracy. There is no final authority and no one should expect
> you to take on that role. If there's a problem, speak up. I seriously doubt
> anyone would be anything but receptive, particularly about this kind of
> thing.
>
> At the same time it's not necessarily the channel's fault if you no longer
> find it valuable enough to hang around. We'd love to have you around again,
> but if that means killing off the community atmosphere by requiring that
> only Habari ever be discussed I don't think it's a good trade.
>
> > I would like to see some steps taken to correct this.  I think that IRC
> > has been a great resource for the project and a great way for
> > participants to communicate both about it and informally to build online
> > friendships within our project, and I would like to continue to use it
> > that way.  It might be useful to write out a loose code of conduct so
> > that there are some  boundaries for what is acceptable.  We have a bunch
> > of new channel ops -- It should be easier for them to point at some
> > "rules" when someone is being abusive or puerile.
>
> As usual, I don't think rules or policies are what we need. With the number
> of differing opinions and viewpoints we have I don't think we could ever
> reasonably expect to come up with any substantial list we could all agree
> on. We're all adults, we should be able to tell for ourselves what's over
> the top for our relaxed IRC environment. At the same time I think it's the
> responsibility of everyone else to help point out things that they don't
> deem as appropriate.
>
> IRC should be fun. I don't think we've ever seriously gotten in the way of
> shop talk, but that doesn't mean we don't need to tone down some of the more
> risque content that's been increasingly popular lately.
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/habari-dev
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to