I thought the reasonable compromise was that Michael realized he was in the minority and agreed to let it go?
On Fri, May 1, 2009 at 9:11 AM, Sean T Evans <[email protected]> wrote: > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > Michael Harris wrote: > > I don't think it was unclear. It said basically what I've said above. > > It has been revised and now says something I don't agree with, because > > I'm concerned that for each minor point release we will have to > > revisit what "trivial" means, what should go in and what shouldn't, > > and the associated bug-introduction risks I've already banged on > > about, when we should be focussing on making a release to address one > > of the above non-trivial issues. > > I think that due to the nature of the minor point releases (MPR) being > triggered by a significant issue, there is more motivation to move them > out the door as quickly as possible. With that motivation in mind, and > to avoid the issue of tying up an MPR debating what is "trivial" or not, > I think it's safe to say that if there's not a clear consensus on a > particular fix, the default is that it can wait. Anything not > significant enough to trigger an MPR on it's own requires clear > consensus (even if it's a lazy consensus) to be included. If there's any > significant debate about a particular fix, it doesn't go in the MPR. > > Does that sound like a reasonable compromise? > - -- > Sean T. Evans > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) > Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org > > iEYEARECAAYFAkn69N4ACgkQmQpMBUWJpdtA1wCfZsh0ff6G5wWhVZX1ebWoA1NE > 6QgAn0kqGSRAy+dOGt8POE1g036xQgDn > =7/uv > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/habari-dev -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
