On Thu, Jul 24, 2003 at 02:03:52PM -0400, jim sloan wrote: > So the name that is being discussed and voted on is for item (3) the dev > group, who may be hosted independent of DFA, and not the Public name > where local groups will be directed to download the kit.
Not quite, unless *I* missed something from the IRC chat last night. It's the *brand name* of the network... which will probably spawn at least one second-level domain, but won't require that. See my reply to Zephyr, as amended. Cheers, -- jra -- Jay R. Ashworth [EMAIL PROTECTED] Member of the Technical Staff Baylink RFC 2100 The Suncoast Freenet The Things I Think Tampa Bay, Florida http://baylink.pitas.com +1 727 647 1274 OS X: Because making Unix user-friendly was easier than debugging Windows -- Simon Slavin, on a.f.c
