On Fri, 18 Apr 2014 11:43:19 +0100 sin <[email protected]> wrote: > Matter of taste and makes it a bit more explicit to me that > argv is an array of pointers to chars (and I can treat them as such). > > Generally if it was char **p, then depending on the situation p++ might > have been invalid, where as char *p[] you would probably expect that > you can access p[0], p[1] up to a certain number of them.
Well, that's a point! Thanks for clearing that up. Maybe we should land a patch on the big bases (ubase, sbase) to make this uniform. Cheers FRIGN -- FRIGN <[email protected]>
