On Fri, Apr 18, 2014 at 12:46:00PM +0200, FRIGN wrote: > On Fri, 18 Apr 2014 11:43:19 +0100 > sin <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Matter of taste and makes it a bit more explicit to me that > > argv is an array of pointers to chars (and I can treat them as such). > > > > Generally if it was char **p, then depending on the situation p++ might > > have been invalid, where as char *p[] you would probably expect that > > you can access p[0], p[1] up to a certain number of them. > > Well, that's a point! > Thanks for clearing that up. > > Maybe we should land a patch on the big bases (ubase, sbase) to make > this uniform.
Yes we should do that :)
