FRIGN wrote: > The given example does not work and the usage is so obvious that an example > probably is not necessary here anyway.
Heyho, I don't think it is that obvious. Have a look at the discussion starting from the slock-1.3 announcement on February 12th this year again. Since the example does not work any more, changing it to `slock sudo s2ram` and adding a note about the needed line in the sudo config so s2ram can be run without a password would be better. The other block looks good and is more simple and flexible than changing the xkb config ourselves from slock.c. --Markus
