On Thu, Mar 15, 2018 at 09:53:41AM -0700, Eric Pruitt wrote: > On Thu, Mar 15, 2018 at 05:11:10PM +0100, Silvan Jegen wrote: > > The disadvantage of this is that you will have to save those > > attachments somewhere and then apply them. When using "git send-email" > > you can just feed the emails directly to "git am". > > That depends on what email client you use. Mutt makes piping both whole > messages and individual attachments to arbitrary commands pretty > painless IMO.
I use mutt as well but I don't know how to deal with attachments efficiently. Mails I can just tag so to apply a series of patches sent with "git send-email" I tag them and pipe them to "git am". If several patches are attached to a mail, I haven't found a good way to download them all in one go and then apply them in batch to a repo. Would definitely like to learn about a more efficient way to deal with attached patches in mutt. Cheers, Silvan
