I would write something, but something in dwm.c should be modified to give polybar some space.
On 03-Oct-2019 6:09 PM, Greg Reagle <[email protected]> wrote:
On Thu, Oct 3, 2019, at 06:26, Abdullah wrote:
> I can use bash for that. But don't you think it will use more resources? Previously I had been using such scripts for
> polybar modules and they were using much resources.
Bash is not a lightweight shell; it is a shell with a lot of features. I would *speculate* that writing in something like rc [1] or ksh [2] [3] would use less RAM.
[1] https://tools.suckless.org/9base/
[2] http://www.kornshell.com/
[3] http://mirbsd.de/mksh
