On 03/10, Teodoro Santoni wrote:
2019-10-03 15:22 GMT+02:00, Abdullah <[email protected]>:I would write something, but something in dwm.c should be modified to give polybar some space.On 03-Oct-2019 6:09 PM, Greg Reagle <[email protected]> wrote:On Thu, Oct 3, 2019, at 06:26, Abdullah wrote: > I can use bash for that. But don't you think it will use more > resources? Previously I had been using such scripts for > polybar modules and they were using much resources. Bash is not a lightweight shell; it is a shell with a lot of features. I would *speculate* that writing in something like rc [1] or ksh [2] [3] would use less RAM. [1] https://tools.suckless.org/9base/ [2] http://www.kornshell.com/ [3] http://mirbsd.de/mkshAh, I see. The freespace patch and/or extrabar may help you, and you can disable the statusbar with the function togglebar in dwm.
Thanks for suggestions. I'll check it now. Abdullah https://abdullah.today C20F 2707 3025 2569 BAC5 534B 7820 6670 C19D 1580
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
