[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-574?page=comments#action_12448810 ] Doug Cutting commented on HADOOP-574: -------------------------------------
> I've started work Great! Jim Kellerman (jim at powerset dot com) has also privately expressed interest in implementing this. Perhaps you can collaborate? > which package should this go in? org.hadoop.s3fs or org.hadoop.fs.s3, or > something else? Let's go with org.apache.hadoop.fs.s3. Someday we should probably move dfs into a subpackage of fs... Are you going to attack HADOOP-571 too, or is anyone else working on that? Otherwise it will be hard to configure a cluster whose default filesystem is S3, or to submit a MapReduce job whose input or output use a non-default filesystem. > want FileSystem implementation for Amazon S3 > -------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-574 > URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-574 > Project: Hadoop > Issue Type: New Feature > Components: fs > Reporter: Doug Cutting > > An S3-based Hadoop FileSystem would make a great addition to Hadoop. > It would facillitate use of Hadoop on Amazon's EC2 computing grid, as > discussed here: > http://www.mail-archive.com/hadoop-user@lucene.apache.org/msg00318.html > This is related to HADOOP-571, which would make Hadoop's FileSystem > considerably easier to extend. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
