On Sun, Jan 23, 2011, Eli Billauer wrote about "[Haifux] No! No! Don't compile your kernel!": > Yet another sign that Linux is turning into a don't-touch-me kind of > system. How many times did they tell me I don't really want to compile > my kernel? > http://wiki.centos.org/HowTos/Custom_Kernel
When was the last time you compiled gcc on your own? When was the last time you compiled the X Window System? For me, the answers to both questions is 1995. If you answered similarly (or even, "never"), why should the kernel be any different - i.e., why do you need to compile a kernel unless you're a kernel developer (and 99.9% of Linux users aren't)? Before Linux had modules, you often needed to recompile the kernel to add new hardware. With the advent of kernel modules (in Linux 1.2 in 1995...), this is no longer the case. So really, why *would* you want to recompile the kernel, unless you are a kernel developer, i.e., modifying the kernel? -- Nadav Har'El | Sunday, Jan 23 2011, 19 Shevat 5771 [email protected] |----------------------------------------- Phone +972-523-790466, ICQ 13349191 |Cats are smarter than dogs. You can't get http://nadav.harel.org.il |eight cats to pull a sled through snow. _______________________________________________ Haifux mailing list [email protected] http://hamakor.org.il/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/haifux
