I'm good. :) -Ed
On Thu, Aug 21, 2008 at 5:17 PM, Chanwit Kaewkasi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > So let's decide a name of the exception. > > How do you think to name it org.apache.hama.ComputationException at the > moment? > > Chanwit > > 2008/8/21 Edward J. Yoon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: >> But, I'm +1 for the no. 1 plan. >> >> -Ed >> >> On Thu, Aug 21, 2008 at 4:48 PM, Edward J. Yoon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> Oh, Good point, >>> >>>>> the exception will be catch to call only LOG.error. >>> >>> Yes, it should be throwing an runtime exception and stop processing. >>> >>> -Ed >>> >>> On Thu, Aug 21, 2008 at 8:28 AM, Chanwit Kaewkasi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>>> Hello, >>>> >>>> In class AbstractMatrix, the exception will be catch to call only >>>> LOG.error. >>>> I would like to discuss a bit more on this issue that how the system >>>> should do when an exception is thrown. >>>> But I don't think only logging an error is not enough. >>>> >>>> 1. re-throw the exception. This needs changes of the interface, >>>> probably we could have the new ComputationException class, or >>>> something. >>>> 2. throw a runtime expection, and of course JVM will die here. >>>> >>>> Regards, >>>> >>>> Chanwit >>>> >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Best regards, Edward J. Yoon >>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>> http://blog.udanax.org >>> >> >> >> >> -- >> Best regards, Edward J. Yoon >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> http://blog.udanax.org >> > -- Best regards, Edward J. Yoon [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://blog.udanax.org
