The exception will be catch to call only logging, so RuntimeException is better.
I'm +1 "org.apache.hama.ComputationException" 2008/8/21, Chanwit Kaewkasi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > So let's decide a name of the exception. > > How do you think to name it org.apache.hama.ComputationException at the > moment? > > Chanwit > > 2008/8/21 Edward J. Yoon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > But, I'm +1 for the no. 1 plan. > > > > -Ed > > > > On Thu, Aug 21, 2008 at 4:48 PM, Edward J. Yoon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > >> Oh, Good point, > >> > >>>> the exception will be catch to call only LOG.error. > >> > >> Yes, it should be throwing an runtime exception and stop processing. > >> > >> -Ed > >> > >> On Thu, Aug 21, 2008 at 8:28 AM, Chanwit Kaewkasi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > >>> Hello, > >>> > >>> In class AbstractMatrix, the exception will be catch to call only > LOG.error. > >>> I would like to discuss a bit more on this issue that how the system > >>> should do when an exception is thrown. > >>> But I don't think only logging an error is not enough. > >>> > >>> 1. re-throw the exception. This needs changes of the interface, > >>> probably we could have the new ComputationException class, or > >>> something. > >>> 2. throw a runtime expection, and of course JVM will die here. > >>> > >>> Regards, > >>> > >>> Chanwit > >>> > >> > >> > >> > >> -- > >> Best regards, Edward J. Yoon > >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >> http://blog.udanax.org > >> > > > > > > > > -- > > Best regards, Edward J. Yoon > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > http://blog.udanax.org > > > -- Yoon Joo Sun Java Developer Engineer Blog - http://www.ologist.co.kr
