[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HAMA-244?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12868446#action_12868446
]
Edward J. Yoon commented on HAMA-244:
-------------------------------------
I think all things of BSP architecture and design should be shared/figured out
before commit them. The final output of this issue will be a document of
architecture and design. (NOT core implementations)
----
I requested you to upload/share your progress several times (via mail privately
and via IRC) but you didn't, until I assigned this issue to me, and decided to
touch the BSP territory to make some progress.
Hyunsik, I don't think It is important who is leading BSP progress or who is
contributing more. As I mentioned above, I don't mean technological milestones
or whatever.
>> I cannot understand you, and I decided to leave the hama.
Perhaps, IMO, 'build your own BSP project' will be better than contribution to
ASF if you want to assert your authority/independence/rights.
> Consider more simplified BSP programming interface
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: HAMA-244
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HAMA-244
> Project: Hama
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: bsp
> Affects Versions: 0.2.0
> Reporter: Edward J. Yoon
> Assignee: Edward J. Yoon
> Fix For: 0.2.0
>
> Attachments: HAMA-244_v01.patch, HAMA-244_v02.patch, patch.txt
>
>
> Perhaps, every BSP program will be consists of three steps such as,
> initialization, SPMD code implementation, and finalization from developer
> angle.
> However, currently there is no interface layer so users have to do all the
> works w/o any guide.
> Would be nice if it allow to use a more simplified interface.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
