Since there's a build.xml, I think, it's not a big problem. :D 2011/5/3 ChiaHung Lin <[email protected]>: > +1 > > The test against ant works fine, including unit tests, submission of HelloBSP. > > When building with maven, unit tests and package work well. A minor question > is how can we build example jar (in ant, it is `ant examples`) through maven? > But I think this is not harmful as the maven build process will only replace > ant after verion 0.3. > > ChiaHung > > -----Original message----- > From:Tommaso Teofili <[email protected]> > To:[email protected] > Date:Mon, 2 May 2011 20:16:04 +0200 > Subject:Re: [VOTE] Release Hama 0.2-incubating RC4 > > +1 > Tommaso > > 2011/5/2 Eric Charles <[email protected]> > >> +1 >> >> Unit tests are successful. >> >> - Eric >> >> >> >> On 1/05/2011 13:29, Edward J. Yoon wrote: >> >>> Hi all, >>> >>> Here's RC4 for Hama 0.2.0. This RC fixes license problem by removing >>> useless dependencies. >>> >>> Artifact and signatures: >>> http://people.apache.org/~edwardyoon/dist/0.2.0-RC4/ >>> >>> SVN Tag: >>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/hama/tags/0.2-RC4/ >>> >>> Please vote on this release. >>> >>> Thanks. >>> >> > > > -- > ChiaHung Lin > Department of Information Management > National University of Kaohsiung > Taiwan >
-- Best Regards, Edward J. Yoon http://blog.udanax.org http://twitter.com/eddieyoon
