And my +1 On Tue, May 3, 2011 at 6:57 PM, Edward J. Yoon <[email protected]> wrote: > Since there's a build.xml, I think, it's not a big problem. :D > > 2011/5/3 ChiaHung Lin <[email protected]>: >> +1 >> >> The test against ant works fine, including unit tests, submission of >> HelloBSP. >> >> When building with maven, unit tests and package work well. A minor question >> is how can we build example jar (in ant, it is `ant examples`) through >> maven? But I think this is not harmful as the maven build process will only >> replace ant after verion 0.3. >> >> ChiaHung >> >> -----Original message----- >> From:Tommaso Teofili <[email protected]> >> To:[email protected] >> Date:Mon, 2 May 2011 20:16:04 +0200 >> Subject:Re: [VOTE] Release Hama 0.2-incubating RC4 >> >> +1 >> Tommaso >> >> 2011/5/2 Eric Charles <[email protected]> >> >>> +1 >>> >>> Unit tests are successful. >>> >>> - Eric >>> >>> >>> >>> On 1/05/2011 13:29, Edward J. Yoon wrote: >>> >>>> Hi all, >>>> >>>> Here's RC4 for Hama 0.2.0. This RC fixes license problem by removing >>>> useless dependencies. >>>> >>>> Artifact and signatures: >>>> http://people.apache.org/~edwardyoon/dist/0.2.0-RC4/ >>>> >>>> SVN Tag: >>>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/hama/tags/0.2-RC4/ >>>> >>>> Please vote on this release. >>>> >>>> Thanks. >>>> >>> >> >> >> -- >> ChiaHung Lin >> Department of Information Management >> National University of Kaohsiung >> Taiwan >> > > > > -- > Best Regards, Edward J. Yoon > http://blog.udanax.org > http://twitter.com/eddieyoon >
-- Best Regards, Edward J. Yoon http://blog.udanax.org http://twitter.com/eddieyoon
