agreed, and this can be part of the planned separation between core and examples code. I can take care of that but I want to be sure the release we just made has reached Maven Central so that such changes happen from 0.4-incubating-SNAPSHOT onwards. Tommaso
2011/7/28 ChiaHung Lin <[email protected]> > +1 > > This seems better to minimize dependency. > > -----Original message----- > From:Edward J. Yoon <[email protected]> > To:[email protected] > Date:Thu, 28 Jul 2011 08:18:09 +0900 > Subject:Re: Separation of Pregel API and Hama core > > I'm attach the private messages with Miklos here. > > 2011/7/27 Miklós Erdélyi <[email protected]>: > > Do you mean creating another maven module, like hama-graph? > > Then I think we should definitely separate it if it does not complicate > the > > build process. > > > > Cheers, > > Miklos > > > > On 27 Jul 2011 08:23, "Edward J. Yoon" <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > That's great. > > > > BTW, Should we separate it from hama-core? > > > > On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 3:52 PM, Thomas Jungblut > <[email protected]> wrote: > > hey all, > > > > what do you think of separating the new Pregel API introduced with > HAMA-409 > > from the Hama Core stuff? > > > > Best Regards, > > Thomas > > > > > > -- > > Thomas Jungblut > > Berlin > > > > mobile: 0170-3081070 > > > > business: [email protected] > > private: [email protected] > > > > > > -- > Best Regards, Edward J. Yoon > @eddieyoon > > > -- > ChiaHung Lin > Department of Information Management > National University of Kaohsiung > Taiwan >
