+1 too. Then, should we use a name like "hama-graph"? or to emphasize the Pregel-clone, should it have own name?
On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 4:56 PM, Tommaso Teofili <[email protected]> wrote: > agreed, and this can be part of the planned separation between core and > examples code. > I can take care of that but I want to be sure the release we just made has > reached Maven Central so that such changes happen from > 0.4-incubating-SNAPSHOT onwards. > Tommaso > > 2011/7/28 ChiaHung Lin <[email protected]> > >> +1 >> >> This seems better to minimize dependency. >> >> -----Original message----- >> From:Edward J. Yoon <[email protected]> >> To:[email protected] >> Date:Thu, 28 Jul 2011 08:18:09 +0900 >> Subject:Re: Separation of Pregel API and Hama core >> >> I'm attach the private messages with Miklos here. >> >> 2011/7/27 Miklós Erdélyi <[email protected]>: >> > Do you mean creating another maven module, like hama-graph? >> > Then I think we should definitely separate it if it does not complicate >> the >> > build process. >> > >> > Cheers, >> > Miklos >> > >> > On 27 Jul 2011 08:23, "Edward J. Yoon" <[email protected]> wrote: >> > >> > That's great. >> > >> > BTW, Should we separate it from hama-core? >> > >> >> On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 3:52 PM, Thomas Jungblut >> <[email protected]> wrote: >> > hey all, >> > >> > what do you think of separating the new Pregel API introduced with >> HAMA-409 >> > from the Hama Core stuff? >> > >> > Best Regards, >> > Thomas >> > >> > >> > -- >> > Thomas Jungblut >> > Berlin >> > >> > mobile: 0170-3081070 >> > >> > business: [email protected] >> > private: [email protected] >> > >> >> >> >> -- >> Best Regards, Edward J. Yoon >> @eddieyoon >> >> >> -- >> ChiaHung Lin >> Department of Information Management >> National University of Kaohsiung >> Taiwan >> > -- Best Regards, Edward J. Yoon @eddieyoon
