Great! Sent from my iPhone
On 2011. 10. 6., at 오후 6:03, "ChiaHung Lin" <[email protected]> wrote: > I apply for setting up group hama in Apache review board. > And now it should be able to be found at https://reviews.apache.org/ Group > area. > > -----Original message----- > From:Edward J. Yoon <[email protected]> > To:[email protected],[email protected] > Date:Tue, 4 Oct 2011 18:57:21 +0900 > Subject:Re: Review then commit > >>> . I would like this (at least +1 from a comitter) to be part of our >>> review-commit process. > > +1 > > 2011/10/4 ChiaHung Lin <[email protected]>: >> Hadoop's practice looks good. I would like this (at least +1 from a >> comitter) to be part of our review-commit process. >> >> -----Original message----- >> From:Vinod Kumar Vavilapalli <[email protected]> >> To:[email protected] >> Date:Sat, 1 Oct 2011 11:15:06 +0530 >> Subject:Re: Review then commit >> >> Apache has the review board: https://reviews.apache.org >> >> Back in Hadoop, we get things via uploading patches to the JIRA issues, >> requiring one single +1 from a committer for the patch to go in. >> >> +vinod >> >> On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 6:23 PM, Thomas Jungblut < >> [email protected]> wrote: >> >>> +1, review tool seems to be a good thing. Do we have something similar in >>> the Apache environment? >>> >>> 2011/9/28 ChiaHung Lin <[email protected]> >>> >>>> +1 >>>> >>>> But in what way are we going to perform such tasks/ procedure? >>>> >>>> Given a quick search on the internet, there are several tools and methods >>>> employed for this procedure: >>>> >>>> 1.) httpd has voting system that if 3 other developers gave positive (+1) >>>> vote and there are no negative (-1) vote[1]. >>>> >>>> 2.) some linux kernel sub systems use patchwork[2] which tracks/ reports >>>> patches series. >>>> >>>> 3.) Google internally uses Mondrian for code review, which has an open >>>> source version released as Rietveld[3]. >>>> >>>> [1]. Patch Review Processes in Open Source Software Development >>>> Communities: A Comparative Case Study. >>>> http://www.computer.org/portal/web/csdl/doi/10.1109/HICSS.2007.426 >>>> >>>> [2]. Reducing your patch workload with Patchwork. >>>> http://linuxplumbersconf.org/2011/ocw/proposals/255 >>>> >>>> [3]. Mondrian: Code Review on the Web. >>>> http://code.google.com/p/rietveld/downloads/detail?name=Mondrian2006.pdf >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> -----Original message----- >>>> From:Tommaso Teofili <[email protected]> >>>> To:[email protected] >>>> Date:Tue, 27 Sep 2011 14:41:06 +0200 >>>> Subject:Re: Review then commit >>>> >>>> +1 for me >>>> Tommaso >>>> >>>> 2011/9/27 Edward J. Yoon <[email protected]> >>>> >>>>> Hi, >>>>> >>>>> Hama committers are on the increase. So it's time to consider the >>>>> development process. >>>>> >>>>> Typically, many apache projects adopt a review-then-commit process. >>>>> >>>>> What do you think? >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> Best Regards, Edward J. Yoon >>>>> @eddieyoon >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> ChiaHung Lin >>>> Department of Information Management >>>> National University of Kaohsiung >>>> Taiwan >>>> >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Thomas Jungblut >>> Berlin <[email protected]> >>> >> >> >> -- >> ChiaHung Lin >> Department of Information Management >> National University of Kaohsiung >> Taiwan >> > > > > -- > Best Regards, Edward J. Yoon > @eddieyoon > > > -- > ChiaHung Lin > Department of Information Management > National University of Kaohsiung > Taiwan
