Totally great, thanks ChiaHung. I hope we will use it ;) 2011/10/6 Edward J. Yoon <[email protected]>
> Great! > > Sent from my iPhone > > On 2011. 10. 6., at 오후 6:03, "ChiaHung Lin" <[email protected]> wrote: > > > I apply for setting up group hama in Apache review board. > > And now it should be able to be found at https://reviews.apache.org/Group > > area. > > > > -----Original message----- > > From:Edward J. Yoon <[email protected]> > > To:[email protected],[email protected] > > Date:Tue, 4 Oct 2011 18:57:21 +0900 > > Subject:Re: Review then commit > > > >>> . I would like this (at least +1 from a comitter) to be part of our > review-commit process. > > > > +1 > > > > 2011/10/4 ChiaHung Lin <[email protected]>: > >> Hadoop's practice looks good. I would like this (at least +1 from a > comitter) to be part of our review-commit process. > >> > >> -----Original message----- > >> From:Vinod Kumar Vavilapalli <[email protected]> > >> To:[email protected] > >> Date:Sat, 1 Oct 2011 11:15:06 +0530 > >> Subject:Re: Review then commit > >> > >> Apache has the review board: https://reviews.apache.org > >> > >> Back in Hadoop, we get things via uploading patches to the JIRA issues, > >> requiring one single +1 from a committer for the patch to go in. > >> > >> +vinod > >> > >> On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 6:23 PM, Thomas Jungblut < > >> [email protected]> wrote: > >> > >>> +1, review tool seems to be a good thing. Do we have something similar > in > >>> the Apache environment? > >>> > >>> 2011/9/28 ChiaHung Lin <[email protected]> > >>> > >>>> +1 > >>>> > >>>> But in what way are we going to perform such tasks/ procedure? > >>>> > >>>> Given a quick search on the internet, there are several tools and > methods > >>>> employed for this procedure: > >>>> > >>>> 1.) httpd has voting system that if 3 other developers gave positive > (+1) > >>>> vote and there are no negative (-1) vote[1]. > >>>> > >>>> 2.) some linux kernel sub systems use patchwork[2] which tracks/ > reports > >>>> patches series. > >>>> > >>>> 3.) Google internally uses Mondrian for code review, which has an open > >>>> source version released as Rietveld[3]. > >>>> > >>>> [1]. Patch Review Processes in Open Source Software Development > >>>> Communities: A Comparative Case Study. > >>>> http://www.computer.org/portal/web/csdl/doi/10.1109/HICSS.2007.426 > >>>> > >>>> [2]. Reducing your patch workload with Patchwork. > >>>> http://linuxplumbersconf.org/2011/ocw/proposals/255 > >>>> > >>>> [3]. Mondrian: Code Review on the Web. > >>>> > http://code.google.com/p/rietveld/downloads/detail?name=Mondrian2006.pdf > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> -----Original message----- > >>>> From:Tommaso Teofili <[email protected]> > >>>> To:[email protected] > >>>> Date:Tue, 27 Sep 2011 14:41:06 +0200 > >>>> Subject:Re: Review then commit > >>>> > >>>> +1 for me > >>>> Tommaso > >>>> > >>>> 2011/9/27 Edward J. Yoon <[email protected]> > >>>> > >>>>> Hi, > >>>>> > >>>>> Hama committers are on the increase. So it's time to consider the > >>>>> development process. > >>>>> > >>>>> Typically, many apache projects adopt a review-then-commit process. > >>>>> > >>>>> What do you think? > >>>>> > >>>>> -- > >>>>> Best Regards, Edward J. Yoon > >>>>> @eddieyoon > >>>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> -- > >>>> ChiaHung Lin > >>>> Department of Information Management > >>>> National University of Kaohsiung > >>>> Taiwan > >>>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> -- > >>> Thomas Jungblut > >>> Berlin <[email protected]> > >>> > >> > >> > >> -- > >> ChiaHung Lin > >> Department of Information Management > >> National University of Kaohsiung > >> Taiwan > >> > > > > > > > > -- > > Best Regards, Edward J. Yoon > > @eddieyoon > > > > > > -- > > ChiaHung Lin > > Department of Information Management > > National University of Kaohsiung > > Taiwan > -- Thomas Jungblut Berlin <[email protected]>
