[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HAMA-457?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13130537#comment-13130537
]
Edward J. Yoon commented on HAMA-457:
-------------------------------------
Please try again your patch.
And,
{quote}
It'd be nice if we can more easily maintenance the barrier synchronizer.
Don't you think it is easier now? Where is the problem?
Before someone starts to feel unstable and wants to implement their own sync
server, I'll report here.
Sadly there is no alternative to zookeeper. If one decides to do so, I am going
to write a tutorial. At least I am the person who have to answer the questions
on the mailing list then. So leave this up to me.
I think it is a great opportunity for others to research new ways of barrier
synchronization. Whether they build their own or improve zookeepers, I don't
care.
{quote}
I mean that we have to focus on making more manageable code.
What do you think how many people will want to implement their own
synchronization server? If user wants to implement their own synchronization
server, why they have to use Hama?
> Refactoring of BSPPeerImpl
> --------------------------
>
> Key: HAMA-457
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HAMA-457
> Project: Hama
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Affects Versions: 0.3.0
> Reporter: Thomas Jungblut
> Assignee: Thomas Jungblut
> Fix For: 0.4.0
>
> Attachments: HAMA-457.patch, HAMA-457_v2.patch
>
>
> Extract a sync service which allows the user to implement and configure their
> own services.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
