Yes, it would; for compatibility reason, we'd want to allow both syntaxes, so the issue would persist. In addition, I'm not sure we'd want to add special-case behavior for pseudo-selectors (although if we had gone with a: b syntax initially, we might have decided to do so).
- Nathan weepy wrote: > would the alternate syntax I suggested still have this problem ? I.e. > would you need the & to be able to specify properly ? > > p > text-align: justify > :first-letter > margin-left: 1em --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Haml" group. To post to this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/haml?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
