if i wanted to try and hack a a: b syntax into a local version - where would i start ? - or is it going to be v hard ?
i understand u dont want to start providing alternate syntax's at this stage in the project, - but i'd like to give it a go :) On Apr 12, 8:01 am, Nathan Weizenbaum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Yes, it would; for compatibility reason, we'd want to allow both > syntaxes, so the issue would persist. In addition, I'm not sure we'd > want to add special-case behavior for pseudo-selectors (although if we > had gone with a: b syntax initially, we might have decided to do so). > > - Nathan > > weepy wrote: > > would the alternate syntax I suggested still have this problem ? I.e. > > would you need the & to be able to specify properly ? > > > p > > text-align: justify > > :first-letter > > margin-left: 1em --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Haml" group. To post to this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/haml?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
