Well... I tried starting up a small Camping app under Mongrel on my MBP and got a memory footprint of 44,116 (according to ps). I then created a simple Rails app with Haml, which specifically does not load ActiveRecord, ActionMailer, or ActionWebService. The memory footprint was 27,372. Obviously, these would change as more requests were served.
This is a pretty ad-hoc measurement, but it doesn't look like using a stripped out version of Rails is so bad after all... and I get to use Haml :) --s On Aug 8, 2007, at 9:41 AM, Hampton wrote: > > No... but I do know that Haml works with Merb. > > -h. > > On 8/8/07, s.ross <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> Not to add insult to Why's injury, but I'm not a Markaby fan. But... >> there are some cases where Rails is just too big a hammer. Has anyone >> tried integrating Haml with Why's Camping (Micro)Framework? >> >> --s >> >>> >> > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Haml" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/haml?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
