That's extremely interesting.... how could Camping get so big? Is it because its loading AR?
-hampton. On 8/9/07, s.ross <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Well... > > I tried starting up a small Camping app under Mongrel on my MBP and > got a memory footprint of 44,116 (according to ps). I then created a > simple Rails app with Haml, which specifically does not load > ActiveRecord, ActionMailer, or ActionWebService. The memory footprint > was 27,372. Obviously, these would change as more requests were served. > > This is a pretty ad-hoc measurement, but it doesn't look like using a > stripped out version of Rails is so bad after all... and I get to use > Haml :) > > --s > > On Aug 8, 2007, at 9:41 AM, Hampton wrote: > > > > > No... but I do know that Haml works with Merb. > > > > -h. > > > > On 8/8/07, s.ross <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> > >> Not to add insult to Why's injury, but I'm not a Markaby fan. But... > >> there are some cases where Rails is just too big a hammer. Has anyone > >> tried integrating Haml with Why's Camping (Micro)Framework? > >> > >> --s > >> > >>> > >> > > > > > > > > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Haml" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/haml?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
