Thanks for the reply. That post was what originally got me looking at jQuery and at UJS. I created test jQuery project that implemented a small subset of zippy effects from one of my recent "real" projects. I then redid the exact same project in Prototype/Scripty using the same unobtrusive techniques. I'm not sold on jQuery. Prototype 1.6 does all the selector magic that jQuery does and has the singular strength that it almost feels like Ruby so I'm not constantly doing vocabulary shifting. Also, and perhaps more important, Prototype implements support for some measure of object-oriented programming.
UJS just does a bit of cool magic under the covers. Heck I can do it myself in Proto/Scripty like I would have to with jQuery. I just figured if it was supported by a plugin and if the plugin was worthwhile and if there was any reason Haml should work with the plugin, maybe it should be looked into end end end. Cheers, --s On Jan 15, 2008, at 1:03 PM, Evgeny wrote: > UJS is a fairly old plugin, and I am not sure about how it's > maintained regarding the latest updates that come to rails. > > For a powerful unobtrusive javascript that does not get outdated, > you might want to read this: > http://errtheblog.com/posts/73-the-jskinny-on-jquery > > > On Jan 15, 2008 8:49 PM, s.ross < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > The UJS plugin rewrites a bunch of Rails helpers. Unfortunately, this > breaks Haml -- and probably every other templating language. Has > anyone had any experience with UJS? Is it worth looking into creating > an optional set of Haml helpers to dovetail with their functionality? > > Thx > > --s > > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Haml" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/haml?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
