This would seem to be the case. The thing about Haml is that it generates beautiful code and taking behaviors out of tags is also an effort in this direction. I'll continue to poke away at this and see how far it gets me.
Thanks. --s On Jan 16, 2008, at 1:27 AM, Geffy wrote: > > I suspect its not an issue with HAML that you're seeing but rather an > incompatibility between UJS and Rails 2.0. You can find a small patch > in the thread on their group. > http://groups.google.com/group/ujs4rails/browse_thread/thread/bfb6895ca45faaea > > Basically they override the tag_options rails method, but the method > signature has changed since and takes one additional argument. > > On Jan 16, 4:31 am, "s.ross" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> I'm not sure what helpers they rewrote but they certainly rewrote >> some >> of the tag helpers like link_to so you get arg count mismatches. >> >> --s >> >> On Jan 15, 2008, at 8:03 PM, Nathan Weizenbaum wrote: >> >>> I'm curious what fails and how when you use UJS with Haml. Can you >>> give >>> an example? > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Haml" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/haml?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
