Hey folks, When Haml was originally created, Hampton decided to make it even easier to create divs than it was to create other sorts of tags by making divs the default.
Mislav Marohnić had an interesting idea for extending this. In some cases, divs are invalid - within a p tag, for example, or an ol. What if instead of producing a div, an implicit tag would create whatever makes sense? A span, an li, maybe a tr or td. There are a few potential issues with this. It makes Haml's output more dependent on the document context than it usually is, and might break a few templates. On the other hand, you should be thinking about the context in which you use divs anyway, and any templates it breaks are invalid anyway. So I wanted to get the community's opinion on this. Is this something you'd like? Something you'd dislike? Or does it not really matter to you? If you want to try it out, grab Mislav's Haml fork at git://github.com/mislav/haml.git. - Nathan --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Haml" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/haml?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
