On Mar 5, 4:46 pm, Lawrence Pit <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Seems to me this (and the other examples given) show that people don't > know what to expect, indicating these smart implicit tags aren't perhaps > advisable. You'd have to think about your future developers who will > read your haml code too.
I would think smart implicit tags would help in this case. It makes it obvious to developers that their assumption about markup is invalid. If they type: %ol .item Foo .item Bar Then look at their generated source and wonder why they see <li> tags instead of <div> tags they will now be educated to the fact that the source they were about to send out is invalid. Just my two cents. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Haml" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/haml?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
