This isn't really what filters are for. Filters are meant for embedding non-Haml text within a Haml document. If you're just want to run a variable through textile, you should call Textile from Ruby code yourself.
ab5tract wrote: > Is it currently possible to give :textile an instance variable to > parse and print the contents of? > > I'd think it would look something like this, > > :textile > = puts @entry.content > > but perhaps it would have to look like :textile= @entry.content, so > that we wouldn't have to worry about looking for '=' and '-' in filter > nestings. > > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Haml" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/haml?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
