Thanks, in this case = RedCloth.new @entry.content
(for future search-grokkers: you have redcloth anyway, if you're trying to :textile) thanks for the quick response. On Apr 12, 12:34 am, Nathan Weizenbaum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > This isn't really what filters are for. Filters are meant for embedding > non-Haml text within a Haml document. If you're just want to run a > variable through textile, you should call Textile from Ruby code yourself. > > ab5tract wrote: > > Is it currently possible to give :textile an instance variable to > > parse and print the contents of? > > > I'd think it would look something like this, > > > :textile > > = puts @entry.content > > > but perhaps it would have to look like :textile= @entry.content, so > > that we wouldn't have to worry about looking for '=' and '-' in filter > > nestings. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Haml" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/haml?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
