Well, there is also the reverse-way way. Maintain an up-to-date subversion,
and just do "git-svn rebase" from time to time. Or just put that into
a subversion
hook.

On Tue, Apr 15, 2008 at 10:16 PM, Nathan Weizenbaum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>  The thing is, I definitely want an up-to-date Subversion repo to still
>  be available, and I don't want to manually maintain it alongside git.
>  Turns out GitHub doesn't have built-in functionality for that after all,
>  so we'd have to roll our own using git-svn and post-receive hooks, which
>  is tricky. On top of that, I don't think git-svn supports adding new
>  tags and branches to the Subversion repo, which is something we'd need.
>
>
>  Evgeny wrote:
>  > Actually I was hoping for make_resourceful to get into github, not
>  > that i'm starting a project and expected it to be there. But it seems
>  > neither Nathan, nor Hampton have a github make_resourceful .. which
>  > would be my choice of an "official" branch.
>  >
>  > today?
>  > tomorrow?
>  >
>  > *wink* *wink*
>
>
>
> >
>

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Haml" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/haml?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to