My guess is that it precludes one from using the '[' character at the beginning of a text element. You've now made that character "special" and it would need to be escaped if is intended to be a text character rather than a haml element.
Of course, that doesn't mean I'm against it... it's just something to think about. :brad On Fri, Dec 12, 2008 at 3:37 PM, Evgeny <[email protected]> wrote: > I just noticed that the [ ] notation does not assume the default %div tag > like #id and .class do. > So when I expected this to work : > [...@product]= "This div had the products class and object id of the > product" > > It only works when I explicitly tell it to be a %div, like so: > %d...@product]= "This div had the products class and object id of the > product" > > > Is there any reason why it should not "just work" with the default? > > > - evgeny > > > > > -- Bradley Grzesiak [email protected] http://toleoandbeyond.blogspot.com * You have received an email from my personal account. Please do not divulge this address to any website (eg: evite, shutterfly, etc). I have another address for such uses; please ask me for it. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Haml" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/haml?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
