#foo and .foo on their own are very reminiscent of CSS, whereas just seeing brackets seems sort of out-of-place to me. So I think requiring an explicit div here is the right thing to do.
Evgeny wrote: > I just noticed that the [ ] notation does not assume the default %div > tag like #id and .class do. > > So when I expected this to work : > [...@product]= "This div had the products class and object id of the > product" > > It only works when I explicitly tell it to be a %div, like so: > %d...@product]= "This div had the products class and object id of > the product" > > > Is there any reason why it should not "just work" with the default? > > > - evgeny > > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Haml" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/haml?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
