Hey folks, I've just pushed several optimizations to Haml, so it should be even zippier now, especially if you're using :ugly. However, in order to get these improvements, I made some pretty big changes to the compiled code Haml generates. I'd appreciate it if you all would test out the new code, both with :ugly and without, just to make sure that all the behavior is consistent. If you notice anything going wrong, please let us know.
Thanks! - Nathan --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Haml" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/haml?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
