The performance boost seems impressive. Nice job.
On Dec 29 2008, 2:49 am, Nathan Weizenbaum <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hey folks,
>
> I've just pushed several optimizations to Haml, so it should be even
> zippier now, especially if you're using :ugly. However, in order to get
> these improvements, I made some pretty big changes to the compiled code
> Haml generates. I'd appreciate it if you all would test out the new
> code, both with :ugly and without, just to make sure that all the
> behavior is consistent. If you notice anything going wrong, please let
> us know.
>
> Thanks!
> - Nathan
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Haml" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/haml?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
