Why not add a new declaration syntax? !!!5 or something, that can be used when not in html5 mode to place the engine into html5 mode for that template?
What am I missing? chris On Sat, Jul 18, 2009 at 10:34 AM, Nathan Weizenbaum <[email protected]>wrote: > Haml processes options on a per-Engine basis, so yes, there is in theory a > way to do this. In practice, it's going to require some monkey-patching. > You'll need to dig around in the Rails template-handling mechanisms, as well > as in lib/haml/template/plugin.rb. > > If you can come up with a nice way to handle this, I'm sure both Rails and > Haml would appreciate a patch. > > > On Sat, Jul 18, 2009 at 2:24 AM, RobL <[email protected]> wrote: > >> >> Hi there, >> >> I'd like to test HTML5 with HAML but only on a single controller / >> namespace within my Rails app. Is there a way to only turn this on >> when you want it. I suppose I could use HAML in my namespace and erb >> outside as its only for testing on an existing site but it feels a bit >> dirty to use different templates languages in the same project. >> >> Cheers >> >> RobL >> >> >> > > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Haml" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/haml?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
