I've considered this, but it's not possible to communicate between the layout and the partials in such a way to make this work. This is particularly so because of how the layout/partial systems differ between frameworks.
On Sat, Jul 18, 2009 at 10:40 AM, Chris Eppstein <[email protected]>wrote: > Why not add a new declaration syntax? > !!!5 or something, that can be used when not in html5 mode to place the > engine into html5 mode for that template? > > What am I missing? > > chris > > > On Sat, Jul 18, 2009 at 10:34 AM, Nathan Weizenbaum <[email protected]>wrote: > >> Haml processes options on a per-Engine basis, so yes, there is in theory a >> way to do this. In practice, it's going to require some monkey-patching. >> You'll need to dig around in the Rails template-handling mechanisms, as well >> as in lib/haml/template/plugin.rb. >> >> If you can come up with a nice way to handle this, I'm sure both Rails and >> Haml would appreciate a patch. >> >> >> On Sat, Jul 18, 2009 at 2:24 AM, RobL <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> >>> Hi there, >>> >>> I'd like to test HTML5 with HAML but only on a single controller / >>> namespace within my Rails app. Is there a way to only turn this on >>> when you want it. I suppose I could use HAML in my namespace and erb >>> outside as its only for testing on an existing site but it feels a bit >>> dirty to use different templates languages in the same project. >>> >>> Cheers >>> >>> RobL >>> >>> >>> >> >> >> > > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Haml" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/haml?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
