On Jan 27, 8:51 am, Norman Clarke <[email protected]> wrote: > First of all, congrats on the release! > > Just one small quibble with your documentation: there are implementations of > Haml in Lua <ttp://github.com/norman/lua-haml> and > Perl<http://github.com/vti/text-haml> that > are nearly syntactically equivalent to Ruby's Haml. We've even gone so far > to create a set of cross-platform of specs that is used by these three > implementations, as well as by implementations in > .Net<http://github.com/lanwin/NHaml_v3>and > PHP <http://github.com/dxw/Fammel>. > > The original Haml *interpreter* targets only one platform (i.e., Ruby), but > the Haml *language* is not tied to Ruby, other than borrowing some of its > syntax. > > So I think it's inaccurate to say the shpaml is "less targeted at one > particular platform." The situation is in fact quite the opposite; shpaml > currently only exists for Python and Javascript, while there are Haml > implementations for Ruby, Python, .Net, PHP, Lua, Perl, and even Erlang. >
Ok, thanks for the clarification. The part about shpaml not being "targeted at one platform" refers to the fact that it does not integrate with the language itself, but I should not make statements that misrepresent haml in doing so. I will try to fix this soon. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Haml" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/haml?hl=en.
