On Fri, Jan 29, 2010 at 6:03 PM, Steve Howell <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Jan 27, 9:05 am, Steve Howell <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Jan 27, 8:51 am, Norman Clarke <[email protected]> wrote: > > > So I think it's inaccurate to say the shpaml is "less targeted at one > > > particular platform." The situation is in fact quite the opposite; shpaml > > > currently only exists for Python and Javascript, while there are Haml > > > implementations for Ruby, Python, .Net, PHP, Lua, Perl, and even Erlang. > > > > Ok, thanks for the clarification. The part about shpaml not being > > "targeted at one platform" refers to the fact that it does not > > integrate with the language itself, but I should not make statements > > that misrepresent haml in doing so. I will try to fix this soon. > > Hi, I just attempted to clean up some references to haml on my > website. I removed a few bullet points that were misleading from > here: > > http://shpaml.webfactional.com/compare > > In the FAQ I now mention that haml supports multiple platforms (and I > keep it vague so as not to fall behind): > > http://shpaml.webfactional.com/faq > > Please let me know if there are still inaccuracies, and I will be > happy to correct them.
Looks good! -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Haml" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/haml?hl=en.
