On Jan 28, 4:53 pm, John Wells <[email protected]> wrote:
> I'm not certain that's completely legal. I'll give it a show, but
> it'll probably make things difficult in other cases where we build up
> this form through partials (i.e., fields_for might be used in a
> partial, while the form_for would be declared in a file calling that
> partial...
Bradley,
This seems to work, although it still feels a bit icky to me. So, for
example, if you had three different scopes in a table, you'd need to
do
- form_for @obj do |a|
- fields_for :address, @address do |b|
- fields_for :something, @something do |c|
%table
%tr
%td
A big ugly, but it works in our case. Thank you. If anyone has any
other solutions, I'd love to hear them as well.
Thanks!
John
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Haml" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected].
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/haml?hl=en.
