Haml doesn't allow you to break the nesting of the HTML document, even with Ruby code. If your code is structured in such a way that that's required, refactor it.
On Thu, Jan 28, 2010 at 1:53 PM, John Wells <[email protected]> wrote: > > > On Jan 28, 4:47 pm, Bradley Grzesiak <[email protected]> wrote: > > Can't you just pull the "fields_for" call outside the %tr? "fields_for" > > doesn't actually output anything, so as long as you're careful with your > 'a' > > and 'b' objects, you should be fine. > > No, I don't think so...because elements within the first td need to > use the a form context. I think what you're saying is this: > > - form_for @obj do |a| > - fields_for :address, @address do |b| > %table > %tr > %td > = a.label :name > = a.text_field :name > = b.label :street > = b.text_field :street > %td > = b.label :city > = b.text_field :city > > I'm not certain that's completely legal. I'll give it a show, but > it'll probably make things difficult in other cases where we build up > this form through partials (i.e., fields_for might be used in a > partial, while the form_for would be declared in a file calling that > partial... > > Thanks, > John > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Haml" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected] <haml%[email protected]>. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/haml?hl=en. > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Haml" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/haml?hl=en.
