We might consider nested mixins with these semantics at some point. We also plan to have a way of keeping an @extend-ed selector from rendering itself; we may make this integrate with nesting somehow.
DAZ, the semantics being proposed here are different from those you proposed: the nested mixins aren't visible outside the scope of the containing mixin. On Fri, Aug 20, 2010 at 9:51 AM, DAZ <[email protected]> wrote: > +1 for nested mixins, I mentioned them here: > > http://groups.google.com/group/haml/browse_thread/thread/79e300d833d1a7f9#msg_1a367b4dd889615b > > DAZ > > On Aug 20, 4:03 pm, Raving Genius > <[email protected]<rg%[email protected]>> > wrote: > > I updated the gist with more details. > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Haml" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected] <haml%[email protected]>. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/haml?hl=en. > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Haml" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/haml?hl=en.
