Hi Nathan, I'm not sure how they are different?
I might not have explained it very well, but I'm fairly sure that I meant the same as Raving Genius. However it is done, I think nested mixins would be a good addition to SASS. cheers, DAZ On Aug 20, 7:24 pm, Nathan Weizenbaum <[email protected]> wrote: > We might consider nested mixins with these semantics at some point. We also > plan to have a way of keeping an @extend-ed selector from rendering itself; > we may make this integrate with nesting somehow. > > DAZ, the semantics being proposed here are different from those you > proposed: the nested mixins aren't visible outside the scope of the > containing mixin. > > > > On Fri, Aug 20, 2010 at 9:51 AM, DAZ <[email protected]> wrote: > > +1 for nested mixins, I mentioned them here: > > >http://groups.google.com/group/haml/browse_thread/thread/79e300d833d1... > > > DAZ > > > On Aug 20, 4:03 pm, Raving Genius > > <[email protected]<rg%[email protected]>> > > wrote: > > > I updated the gist with more details. > > > -- > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > > "Haml" group. > > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > > [email protected] <haml%[email protected]>. > > For more options, visit this group at > >http://groups.google.com/group/haml?hl=en. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Haml" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/haml?hl=en.
