On 15 Apr 2010, [email protected] wrote:

> Indeed, but it can happen due to defaults sections. In 1.4.4, you'd get a
> warning and the option would be disabled anyway. I'll check in 1.3 if it's
> worth adding such tests, but I don't want to discourage 1.3 users from
> updating their version due to invasive warnings, and I will not release a
> version with just that. So maybe we'll add a few silent ignores in the
> config parser if it happens to be worth it.

I think it might be a better idea to warn the user only if he/she
explicitly define 'option forceclose' in a 'mode tcp' section.

If it's in the default, haproxy just need to disable it.
-- 
Cyril Bouthors

Reply via email to