On Fri, Apr 16, 2010 at 10:40:15AM +0200, Cyril Bouthors wrote: > On 15 Apr 2010, [email protected] wrote: > > > that's one possibility. Many people use another method : they have one > > "defaults" section for all HTTP settings, then they declare all their > > HTTP sections, then a new "defaults" section for all TCP settings and > > they declare their TCP sections. Since one defaults section completely > > replaces the previous one for the following sections, you can easily > > proceed that way. > > Or maybe we need a 'http defaults' section?
No, because there are people who already use different http defaults depending on applications. In fact what we need is to be able to explicitly indicate in a section what defaults section it relies on. Willy
